Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
You know Club, I read the blog passage you posted on those "lies" by Kerry on his meetings in NYC with members of the Security Council, and the passage did not seem even internally consistent.
In other words, I read the revelation of the "truth" as being basically consistent with the supposed "lies" in the quotes from Kerry. It really seemed like someone straining with all their heart to manufacture a story when what Kerry said was basically true (i.e. he did go to NYC, he did meet with members of the Security Council, etc. prior to the vote on the Iraq resolutions.)
No serious person could consider that to be a "lie" -- much less think that it would or should hurt his campaign as an "October Surprise."
S_A_M
|
Huh? He said he met with all the members of the security council pre-war. Many are on record saying they did not meet with him. How is the truth consistent with the lie?