Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I did just okay in con Law, but wasn't Bush v Gore about stopping judicial activism. Basically some state judges were saying the state's procedures for counting votes don't matter.
|
No. Bush v. Gore was about one activist group trumping another. The supremes stomped on states' rights. They told the FL Court how its state election laws would be administered.
But they'll distinguish it from Roe with some absurd argument.
I'll at least concede that Roe was activism. You'll never hear any of the hard righters concede the same on Bush v. Gore.
