LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 148
0 members and 148 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-05-2004, 12:03 AM   #781
NotFromHere
No title
 
NotFromHere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 8,092
Settle a bet with a feisty coworker.

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
I can't reconcile this. If a semicolon is the appropriate punctuation, it's a run-on sentence, no?

My feisty coworker was telling me that it's not a run-on because there is an implied "because." I told em that I was unaware of the "implied because" doctrine that excuses run-on sentences. Em is otherwise very bright (hi, em!) but, bitch, please --- "implied because"?
Atticus. I did not know that you worked at Starbucks. I'll have a double tall non-fat latte.

Isn't there also an inplied "be" before careful, with an understood you? Wouldn't that then be 2 sentences and not a runon?
__________________
Ritchie Incognito is a shitbag.
NotFromHere is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 AM.