LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 147
0 members and 147 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-05-2004, 12:20 AM   #784
Replaced_Texan
Random Syndicate (admin)
 
Replaced_Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,281
Settle a bet with a feisty coworker.

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
I can't reconcile this. If a semicolon is the appropriate punctuation, it's a run-on sentence, no?

My feisty coworker was telling me that it's not a run-on because there is an implied "because." I told em that I was unaware of the "implied because" doctrine that excuses run-on sentences. Em is otherwise very bright (hi, em!) but, bitch, please --- "implied because"?
My thought is that yes, it is a run-on if "careful" is an independent clause. I can see an argument that it is a dependent clause, but I think it stands on its own. "Implied because" is silly, and fiesty co-worker should be bitchslapped with a grammar text for even suggesting such a thing.

But then I always thought that there should have been a colon in "Buffy the Vampire Slayer." I lost that battle.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
Replaced_Texan is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 AM.