Quote:
Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
Go back and think through that formula especially the second part. If a woman has large breasts, you are still not going to put up with a large waist. Or even bulky forearms. Your ratio thing really only applies to certain body parts. Which is fine, NTTAWWT and okay then.
|
How many chicks do you know with a wide waist or bulky forearms?
FWIW, there are a few cardinal sins re body parts:
A man cannot have woman's hips. I'm a guy and I find that disturbing to look at.
An otherwise skinny man probably ought not to have miniature breasts. If one must have man breasts, he should be plump all over. Nothing is worse than talking to "Eugene" from accounting who favors white golf shirts and has a slight frame holding an ample roll and a perfectly tear drop shaped man breasts. Nauseating.
A woman can't have an ample beer gut/rolls like a man. It just looks bizarre.
Kankles are generally a problem. They can be surmounted, but they are problematic.
Man hands are bad. A chick can have beaten up hands that show she enjoys physical activities, but if she has stubby, fat little hands like Danny DeVito, thats going to freak the average guy out.
Unibrow. Goes without saying.
