Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
No, I tend to agree with Ty that it should be viewed with reference to what would be in furtherance of the militia. But that really isn't much of a limit, is it? Point is, it is a right granted to the people, and I thought Ty's initial post suggested only militia members had the right.
|
I'm not sure I understand this. If the right to bear arms is a right that should be regulated based on furthering the militia, why would anyone not eligible for call-up need a right to bear an arm?
