LawTalkers
Forums
User Name
Remember Me?
Password
Register
FAQ
Calendar
Go to Page...
» Site Navigation
»
Homepage
»
Forums
»
Forum
>
User CP
>
FAQ
»
Online Users: 140
0 members and 140 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
»
Search Forums
»
Advanced Search
Thread
:
Fringey's taut-abbed painter
View Single Post
12-17-2004, 12:54 PM
#
1504
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
Apprentice Spoilers
Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
See, that's what you're not getting. You say it's fun to shoot your mouth off and defend what you've said but then suggest that there's something wrong with people wanting to "beat you up" for what you've said. Should I pick on your looks instead? You want to be challenged, but you dismiss those who like to challenge you? Talk about hypocrisy.
I don't have a "preconceived" notion about you. My notions about you have been formed by what you have posted, and quite naturally that effects how I perceive you. That's a basic facet of human intelligence.
I don't
want
to think you are a misogynist. I think your posts come across as misogynistic. When you reduce a woman to her parts -- great tits and stomach, haggard face without caked on makeup -- you don't seem like a man who loves women. Haggard is a really nasty, loaded thing to say about a woman, and given how smart you think you are, you should know that.
Further, when you say there's an "appropriate line" for women in the workplace, you imply that there are different
appropriate
lines for women and men. We both know that there aren't. The line is between aggressive and abusive. The difference is that women are often perceived as having crossed that line earlier than men are -- by both men and women. As a result, they have to be more careful about it because they won't get the same results men would get.
I don't think it's unfair to criticize a woman who wants to succeed in business for failing to recognize that point. Your point was that the woman on the Apprentice was so far over the line that there could be no reasonable argument that people were judging her more harshly because she is a woman. That's a valid point. But don't be such a fucking pussy about it -- just call her a bitch and don't try to go all Alan Alda on our asses.
And the mere fact that you have lamented sexism on the Apprentice doesn't mean that you don't have sexist attitudes. It's about as convincing as "How about that Denzel Washington? Great actor."
Finally, don't use impact as a fucking verb.
Damn, mmmmm. You just got impacted.
TM
ThurgreedMarshall
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by ThurgreedMarshall
Powered by
vBadvanced
CMPS v3.0.1
All times are GMT -4. The time now is
12:50 PM
.
-- LawTalk Forums vBulletin 3 Style
-- vBulletin 2 Default
-- Ravio_Blue
-- Ravio_Orange
Contact Us
-
Lawtalkers
-
Top
Powered by:
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By:
URLJet.com