Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
This was sort of the point I was trying to make yesterday when I suggested you and I could thoughtfully analyze our posts and separate out the lesser posts, but GGG was going to simply have to not post every other one.
|
Do you think I'll get contempt if I write the following brief:
"Red blanket cat soap phone monkey bar Lou Reed and the Velvets Lucy in the Sky pie eye hello hey now my baby don't shake it like she used to mountain top candy carved melotrone sverethelementment, Inc. Cazart! Amen. Hallelujah.
I could argue the above with just as much effectiveness to this Court as any of the well reasoned arguments made in the past several months. Either as a result of activist bent or sheer inability to understand the statute at issue, it is clear this Court will not follow the law."
I am considering whether to argue gibberish to the Court in my next appearance. You think that will get me thrown in the clink? I am arguing before a political hack with brain the size of a walnut. The man's an utter imbecile.
