Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Andrea Yates' conviction was overturned because an expert gave testimony about a Law & Order episode that never existed. My question is why is this guy not being prosecuted for purjury? Shouldn't you see a Law & Order episode showing a mom drowning her kids before you testify about it?
|
Good. She was insane.
(The witness wrote to the prosecutor shortly after the trial, I think, explaining that he had confused some other shows, and apologizing for his mistake. So, no real basis for perjury.)
