LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 767
0 members and 767 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-17-2003, 01:40 PM   #9677
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Preorgasmic????

Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
We are assuming they are dating men their own age, yes?




You are so funny, the way you pretend to know nothing about women!



Sebby, dear, fire up those synapses and think about your two posts in tandem. Maybe the second post could help you answer the question posed in the first?
RP,

Help a doddering fool with a broken sarcasm meter like myself out a bit... Are you saying the 33 year old was better than the 23 year olds because she'd had orgasms while the 23 year olds hadn't? If that's what you're saying, (a) I don't buy it and (b) the reason the 33 year old was better was because she had so much fucking confidence. Hell, she dominated. I played as aggressively as I knew she wanted, but in the end, she was leading and I was following.

Every chick at any age can have an orgams with a man if she's willing to tell him what to do. Sex is only really fun if you give up the fear of being embarrassed. Once a chick's been divirced or hit 30 single, she's passed being embarrassed, so she'll have more orgasms regularly. HOWEVER, there's no reason a chick at 23 shouldn't have just as many orgasms. Why is 30 the barrier age for sexual confidence for chicks? That's something I'll never get. As far as I'm concerned, getting an orgasm far outweighs any embarrassment that may be occasioned in the process.

S(I'd wear a clown suit to bed if I knew it guranteed phenomenal sex)D
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:34 PM.