Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
This seems so obvious to me that I can't understand why anyone is bothering to bicker with pj about it. There are exceptions, of course, but please.
|
Oh for Christ's Fucking Sake...
If I had a nickel for every older woman or angry spinster who ripped older guys who fucked younger women apart as insecure or pathetic, I'd have a 600 SL. Its the reverse of the argument made by unsuccessful men that women are whores because they'll fuck ugly men with money.
Look, old guys fuck young women because they can. If I offer you a weather beaten sedan or a brand new convertible, which are you going to take? This entire discussion has avoided out of politeness explaining exactly how selective men select mates - 1. Looks (if you ain't got em, you ain't attracting anyone); 2. Brains (If you're dumb, most guys will still fuck you, but probably not date you for long); 3. Spark (Chemistry, etc...).
Anyone who offers any hierarchy or argument that suggests looks aren't the threshold or that they should not be the threshold betrays a naivete so deep they are simply unqualified to discuss dating, etc...
