LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,375
0 members and 2,375 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-18-2005, 11:10 PM   #1648
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,150
National healthcare

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Uh,



whatever.



Are you willing to pay to expand the safety net to people whose employers have been more successful than your parents' employers in keeping unions out? Because it's getting to the point that the only lower-middle-class employed people with benefits are those whose unions negotiate them.

I have a headache, and I suspect I am, with this post, inviting it to get much much worse.

Oh dearest! I don't have a problem if some realistic plan was in place to pay health care for those w/o. I'm not saying this as a come-on, but I am one well paid mug. But there are millions of people who have really good health care and can't afford to pay for extra once you guys "fix" the system. But either way, my sweet, our kids will have braces/ shots/ etc.

Edit- pls. get spellcheck

__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 01-18-2005 at 11:12 PM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 AM.