LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,717
0 members and 1,717 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-19-2005, 01:38 PM   #1670
Replaced_Texan
Random Syndicate (admin)
 
Replaced_Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,282
National healthcare

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
whose ethics (or under what ethical system)? IF they don't get to see a doctor, then the doctor's ethics aren't implicated.
The system's ethics. Hell, we have a problem terminating whatshername Shivo's (very expensive) care in Florida because someone thinks she's benefiting from it.

I don't have a problem with healthcare rationing per se (I was and continue to be in love with the Oregon model that Bush I slapped down as barbaric), but I do have a problem with cutting people off because of class or age, and no one has been able to show how it's possible to cut people off.

When most end-of-life treatment starts, the caregivers don't know it's the end of that patient's life, and a hell of a lot of patients in the same situation pull through. The physicians', nurses' and other allied health professionals' ethics get involved with withdrawing that care.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79

Last edited by Replaced_Texan; 01-19-2005 at 01:40 PM..
Replaced_Texan is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19 AM.