LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 154
0 members and 154 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-20-2005, 03:39 PM   #640
dtb
I am beyond a rank!
 
dtb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Appalaichan Trail
Posts: 6,201
Weeping for Humanity, Indeed

Quote:
Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
A colleague of mine once wrote an article in which he used the word "incentivize" three or four times. I deleted it, saying that I thought it was "made up", and looked silly. This was in 1999. Now, six years later, the debate still rages. It's unfortunately probably here to stay.
Sadly, I concur; hence the subject line.

My objection to this particular word is that it's just lazy. I don't have a quarrel with the "living language" and shit -- but this is just unadulterated intellectual sloth. The “new” words that pop up to identify new things (e.g., telephone, internet, fax, yadda yadda yadda), or slang or shorthand that worms its way in (e.g., yadda yadda yadda) don't provoke me at all, but “incent”? No. I stand firm. Won't you join me?
dtb is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:20 PM.