Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
The guy who wrote the piece is not a regular Slate writer. He is, as disclosed in the piece, the lawyer for the plaintiffs in that case.
If you want to post something that establishes that "everyone in authority" disagrees with Slate, go ahead, but my understanding is consistent with what Sidd said -- your theories have been kicked around, but rarely adopted. And so far you haven't posted anything to suggest that the author of that piece is wrong in his factual characterizations. Go ahead and try, though.
|
A. "Everyone in authority" was meant to mean, the court, and to some extent the DOJ. I missed the part about the writer being the claimants' attorney. Strangely, that doesn't dissuade me from my original point. Shockingly, it leaves me more confident.
B. Can't try until I see the raw data - i.e., the pleadings and order.
