Quote:
Originally posted by Gattigap
It's this kind of thinking, presumably, that permits you to roll your eyes at the Buchanans, and to pretend that the DeLays aren't wackos (because they ARE setting legislative agendas, and, by definition they can't be on the fringe, can they?) but still allows you the freedom to recoil in horror from the Boxers, because the number of people who would have the temerity to call out Rice is somewhere south of that 93%.
|
You misunderestimastand.
Buchanan and Delay aren't going to cost the R's anything. My point is, Boxer and Dean and Kerry are going to cost the D's, big time. For some reason, the inclusion of Delay seems to get out the R votes, while a move to a more extreme position will not help Ds. R's still occupy a large middle portion, while also encompassing the Buchanuts. D's are simply narrowing their tent.
And, no, it isn't the serenity that allows that outlook. It's the drugs.
