Quote:
Originally posted by str8outavannuys
Ok, I didn't read LFM's post the same way you did. I took it at face value (I thought the Yale-reference was complementary shtick), seeing as how it was an informed, though flawed, argument that has been the subject of some scholarship among labor econ types.
I am ROFL-ing by the juxtaposition of your comments that (a) you find my analysis unconvincing (my analysis being that people can correctly say that they earn a wage different from their market value), and (b) your asserting that you make more than your market value. Funny highbrow stuff! Much respect.
|
1) what is a "complementary schtick"? It sounds like something I would invent but I am at a loss.
2) Juxtaposition is my favorite word.. Don't use it again bc you are ruining it for me.
