LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,665
0 members and 1,665 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-07-2005, 04:30 PM   #2543
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
SS & savings

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
If the Democrats held the White House and Congress, I would hope that they would try to do something about Medicare and the budget deficits, which are more pressing problems than SS.

This White House has absolutely zero interest in reaching a bipartisan compromise to save and better fund Social Security. What you say is a little bit like saying that Charlie Brown ought to take another run at the football, because Lucy might let him kick it this time.
This is the common refrain these days - If Bush is going to do X, he should do it here first. We saw it with Iraq ("Are we going to invade every country with human rights violations") and we are now seeing it with SS.

I agree with most of BRC's posts (surprise surprise) - the DEMs won't come up with a plan to save SS because they absolutely do not want Bush/GOP to get credit for "fixing" it. So instead they equate fixing SS with PRAs, meaning that if you are against PRAs you must be against SS reform. It's a smart PR campaign.
sgtclub is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 AM.