LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 5,866
0 members and 5,866 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-08-2005, 07:11 PM   #2697
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,150
Strange Bedfellows

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
No, it means that he would treat rich people and poor people equitably, by not favoring income earned from passive investment over income earned from work.
So part of his taking my retirement money is he'll take less of my income than he will of poorer people? Cause it sounds like he wants both. Or is he thinking it'll only apply to the Kennedy like amongst us?

Quote:
Tell me, do you think the mortgage interest deduction is a "step towards equality"?
That is encouraging home ownership by making taxes less. But 1)the taxes I would otherwise pay don't go directly to anything- so it's not like the deduction takes from the poor (SS, especially G's SS, takes from the richer to give the poorer) it takes from the general fund- and home ownership can extend pretty far down the economic ladder.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 02-08-2005 at 07:15 PM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:56 AM.