LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,898
0 members and 1,898 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-08-2005, 09:36 PM   #2709
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,150
Strange Bedfellows

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Any deduction necessarily imposes greater costs on those who don't get the deduction -- either you make up the lost revenue from them, or you make it up by borrowing and they bear at least some of that burden.*

So, the mortgage interest deduction shifts costs. Generally onto poorer people. And we do this because we want to favor the "common good" of home ownership, and the group of homeowners. And all of them individually, too.


*And no, you can't say "just make it up through not spending it" because unless all taxes are zero, any deduction means the government is getting funding from some other source.

If there was no deduction the government would take some more money from me. Maybe they'd pay for a school or a bomb or food stamps. SS is taking money from one to give another. I'm in favor of SS Sidd, but it is a step towards equalizing. I'm done-

PS: Safety nets equalize- you're a hippy- you haven't read Harrison Bergeron?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 02-08-2005 at 10:11 PM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 AM.