LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 125
0 members and 125 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-19-2003, 05:51 PM   #10226
ThrashersFan
Puck You
 
ThrashersFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Surrounded by idiots and assholes.
Posts: 1,076
Vanity?

Quote:
Originally posted by ABBAKiss
Okay, this is just stupid. First of all, it takes a lot to burn 100 calories--like running a mile. Also, an individual's weight affects how quickly calories are burned. Aside from the ridiculous specificity of "112 calories" this would have to be one long and spastic orgasm.

But if this is true, it could be that the skinny ones are not fakers, but rather multi-orgasmic. Four real orgasms would still burn more than one fake one.
According to this calorie calculator, I burn 64.8 calories watching TV for an hour. I am not sure if a 112 calorie orgasm is so unbelievable. I think the fake burns more because you are trying so hard to do something that should happen naturally with ease.


http://www.nutri-facts.com/calcalc.asp
__________________
When you say Budweiser you've said it all.
ThrashersFan is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 AM.