LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,173
0 members and 2,173 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-17-2005, 06:18 PM   #3285
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Brit Hume, deceptive hack

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk


We all have our own particular idea of whose ox should be gored. The difference is that some of us recognize that one of the functions of a representative democracy is to spread some of the benefits and burdens of this most economically blessed nation on Earth.
I don't think what I've been saying is necesarily in tension with any of your goals. You seem to be stuck on the idea that consumption tax=flat tax. That's not necessarily the case. That may be the cheapest to administer (or it may not), but one could use the current income tax system but shift the tax burden to those who consume, and particularly those who consume a lot, and have it just as progressive as the current scheme (although, sure, it would benefit those who save more than those who borrow for consumption).
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 AM.