LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 212
0 members and 212 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-18-2005, 01:30 PM   #3390
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
For Club

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
I'd prefer the consumption tax (structured as discussed) to either a VAT or a flat tax, both of which are being floated. And, in terms of my primary goal (progressivity) it's immensely preferable to either of those.
What if we tax each use of your vibrator- some per orgasm amount- rather than just the initial purchase. Or better let the vibrator be relatively tax free but heavily tax batteries. I believe if we did this sort of thing, some of the geekier guys in your part of the country might get more dates.


mmmm floats*


*midwest term for pop with ice cream- not sure if regional
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 PM.