LawTalkers
Forums
User Name
Remember Me?
Password
Register
FAQ
Calendar
Go to Page...
» Site Navigation
»
Homepage
»
Forums
»
Forum
>
User CP
>
FAQ
»
Online Users: 2,493
0 members and 2,493 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
»
Search Forums
»
Advanced Search
Thread
:
A Forum for Grinches and Ho-Ho-Hoes
View Single Post
02-23-2005, 02:42 PM
#
3661
Shape Shifter
World Ruler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,057
Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
I think your main objective is not based on ideology, but rather, party affiliation.
This is sure to get a fun response, but on the whole Bush may be more liberal than Clinton. Think about it:
1. Under Clinton we had surpluses; under Bush we have deficits.
2. Under Clinton, we had a reduction in an entitlement program (i.e., welfare). Under Bush we have an extremely expensive new entitlement program.
3. Under Clinton we had NAFTA and other free trade initiatives. Under Bush we have new tariffs.
4. Both Clinton and Bush subscribe to the "mend it don't end it" line on affirmative action.
5. Both Clinton and Bush were against gay marriage.
6. Bush has increased gross spending for, and has essentially federalized, education.
7. Under Bush we have extensive new regulation of the securities markets.
I could go on, but that should be enough to trigger the wave.
Under Clinton, black people were allowed to vote.
__________________
"More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any other way."
Shape Shifter
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Shape Shifter
Powered by
vBadvanced
CMPS v3.0.1
All times are GMT -4. The time now is
04:46 PM
.
-- LawTalk Forums vBulletin 3 Style
-- vBulletin 2 Default
-- Ravio_Blue
-- Ravio_Orange
Contact Us
-
Lawtalkers
-
Top
Powered by:
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By:
URLJet.com