LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 3,378
0 members and 3,378 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-23-2005, 08:41 PM   #3693
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
bad news, club

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
C'mon, there's a clear public benefit to urban development. [ASIDE]I can't believe I'm having this conversation with a conservative.[/ASIDE]
But does that benefit outweight the taking? New condos substituted for old homes does not IMHO.

Quote:
On the railroad cases, I think the railroads got the land, but what difference does it make? If you lay down RR track, you can't build a firehouse on top of it.
Don't get me wrong, I think a RR, much like a freeway, is in the public interest, but it strikes me as different if the land that is the subject of the taking is not owned by the government - it then starts to look like redistribution or a micromanaged econmony.
sgtclub is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 PM.