LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,683
0 members and 1,683 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-24-2005, 03:53 PM   #3780
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,084
bad news, club

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
The problem is that conservatives value the protection of property rights over urban renewal. It is not just the monetary value, but the value of the right as well.
If you're getting compensated for the market value of your property -- fairly, let's suppose -- and for things like relocation, what about the property right isn't being protected? Your argument is circular: Why do you oppose urban renewal in this case? Because you want to protect property rights. What's to the property right if someone is compensated? It's the right not to have your property taken for urban renewal.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:09 AM.