LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 219
0 members and 219 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-25-2005, 12:13 AM   #3910
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
bad news, club

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Trade restrictions are always special ineterest proposals. They temporarily benefit a small number of people to the dentriment to the short term and long term benefit of the entire society. The argument between restricted trade and free trade is just as moot as the argument between socialism and capitalism. Any argument against free trade is just rehashed arguments used by socialist for economic statism.
I'm not talking about trade restrictions. I'm talking about a package that includes (a) removing trade restrictions, and (b) some kind of benefits for the people who get screwed as a result. (Like we compensate who have their property taken when the government wants to do something better with it.)

Quote:
That argument can be made for anyone who gets pushed out by scientific progress or greater efficiencies, not just free trade. It is just another example of the old man who makes stagecoach wheels and can't do anything else.
The difference being that free trade, unlike scientific progress, is a political decision, not a fact of nature.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:22 AM.