Quote:
Originally posted by JustForFun
Well go back and read it again shit for brains. I describe a completely consensual situation and detect an element of sex is power in it, and then the genius known as ABBAKiss calls me a rapist.
I then point out that rape is when there is no consent and violence, and argue that a fully consensual situation where there is an element of sexual power is not a rape because there is consent, and then shit for brains you thinks that means power = consent.
OK paigow, you can have your board back. Although flames won't chase me away, sheer stupidity will.
Reading Tyrone's lame ass Slate.com and Salon.com articles sure beats arguing with morons.
|
You're the fucking idiot. In the post that Bilmore responded to with the Lewinski scenario, you stated "Rape is when sex = violence and there is no consent. Sex = power is an entirely different concept, one that always includes consent as I see it. If it doesn't include consent, then back to sex = violence."
See the sentence there where YOU say that Sex=power ALWAYS includes consent? Go back to your post and read it again.
I'd be happy to chase you away from this board, but it's not from my stupidity. It's from your making idiotic comments and being totally unable to own up to them.
