LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 132
0 members and 132 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-03-2003, 07:09 PM   #800
JustForFun
No Junk In This Trunk
 
JustForFun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: People's Republic of California
Posts: 115
Reading Comprehension 101

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
Actually, you calling Slave a wannabe-rapist is what truly got us into this topic. If you can make assertions like that, based on no evidence, we are certainly entitled to do the same. Tat for tit.
Slave fantasizes about shoving his cock in a woman's mouth to shut her up and describes this fantasy in a post on an Internet bulletin board. That is a description of a violent non-consensual sex act. I tell him that he should see a therapist before he acts on his fantasies. That is why I called him a wannabe rapist.

I then describe a mutually consensual act and the genius known as ABBAKiss thinks that would qualify as a rape and calls me a wannabe rapist.

This leads me to realize many people who post on this board are stupid or not really lawyers. Or were absent or sleeping the day their Crim Law professor taught them about the elements of a rape.
__________________
Changing minds, one post at a time.

Last edited by JustForFun; 04-03-2003 at 07:41 PM..
JustForFun is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:08 AM.