Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
I am confused here?
Chad and Free Terri are Socks. Correct?
Or is one a real person and the other one is a sock having fun with the real person and egging them on?
On one hand I can't believe that someone would be stupid enough to use this type of language and line of argument to try and change the minds of a bunch of a lawyers. The language is way to exageratted and over the top to be real.
On the other hand, I have met a lot of fruit loops in politics, and there may be people this stupid and crazy out there.
But on the other hand, if they were this crazy and stupid the moderators would block them. Correct?
Or on the other hand, are the moderators letting these fruitloops continuing to post so we can all have something laugh at. I have to admit is fun waiting to see what these two are going to post next.
But again, I heard that it is conventional wisdom that the first person to use a reference to Nazi's loses the argument. With all these references to Nazism, they have to be a sock correct?
Can someone enlighten me?
|
You are over-thinking this. In general, when you see a post flecked with virtual saliva, just think "Penske has another sock" and move on.
