Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Last I heard, in order to not be married anymore you have to either get divorced or one of the parties has to die. Neither has happened in this case, and in fact that Catholic religion of hers that they keep citing would prevent divorce. There are thousands of marriage arrangements out there and I know a lot of Catholics in holding pattern relationships waiting for a (non persistent vegetative state) spouse to die before tying the knot. There has been NO evidence that the marital bonds in this case have been broken, notwithstanding other relationships.
|
Who said the marriage had been broken? Who is disputing that the marriage is intact? The point is that not everyone who views the situation as a potential conflict is disrespecting the sanctity of the marriage. After 15 years and two kids with a new woman, how DARE anyone take that into account when voicing their opinion on the issue. No conflict of interest would even be possible here, right, because the marriage wasn't dissolved in a divorce? Anyone who questions whether the new arrangement is unduly coloring the decision is retarded?
