LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 745
0 members and 745 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 8,352, Today at 05:33 AM.
View Single Post
Old 03-30-2005, 12:02 AM   #1597
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,172
I am confused

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Am I naive or is this not reasonable:

1) Rape of anyone is never acceptible in any circumstances.

2) Innocent people (non-combatants) should never be tortured.

3) Torture of prisoner combatants should be avoided whenever possible. The only possible excuse for torture is that the prisoner combatant has information that is needed immediately to prevent harm to fellow combatants or innocents and the information can only be obtained through torture.

4) If extrating information is necessary:

a) Drugs and trickory or other methods should be tried first. For example threatening to use violence or other stuff against their family. But under no circumstances should stuff like that ever happen.

b) If torture is used, the physical abuse should be kept to a minimum. In other words use sleep deprivation, ridicule and starvation.

These rules hold true no matter what the enemy is doing to our prisoners.
Understanding that (1) the circustances you describe in #3 are exceedingly rare and (2) any information you get from torture is almost certainly wrong, I don't disagree.
Adder is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 PM.