Quote:
Originally posted by andViolins
A woman accused of endangering her baby by breast-feeding while driving on the Ohio Turnpike should not be the defendant, her husband said.
When I first read this, I thought, 'O.K., maybe he was really driving or was with her in the car and made her do it. However, the key section in the article sez:
"She could have had the original police charges, driving without a license, obstructing official business and violating the child safety-seat law, reduced to a single guilty plea to driving under suspension, according to court records. She then could have closed her case by posting a $100 fine.
But her husband, Brad L. Barnhill, 46, said religious beliefs put him in charge of his wife's actions.
''I'm responsible for what she does, and no one can punish her except me,'' he said. ''If they refuse to allow me the free exercise of my religion, then we're going to appeal this all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States and they're not going to be able to try her before then.''
|
I wonder if this idiot is also going to try to "represent" her in court. I have $50 that says he does. Obviously he has no concept of standing -- or practicing without a license, most likely.
Quote:
Originally posted by andViolins
Barnhill said his faith is rooted in The First Christian Fellowship for Eternal Sovereignty, an organization founded in the late 1990s. Barnhill said he is a minister in the fellowship with 650 followers."
aV
|
What's scarier, that this guy thinks he has the right to punish his wife, or that he has 650 "followers".
P.S. MND -- I thought you might like a dude like this. The punishment may involve a good spanking.
sf
