LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,245
0 members and 1,245 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-15-2005, 12:29 AM   #14
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
Should five percent appear too small

Quote:
Originally posted by Not Bob
I love it when my re lines live on. It makes me feel almost, like, immortal or something.

Where was I? Oh, yeah. Substance. Sorry.

Looking for deductions and credits that you are entitled to is fine. Lying about whether you are entitled to them is not. The only thing I remember from my tax class is that while tax avoidance is encouraged -- the Code is now intended to drive social policy, after all; tax evasion is a crime. Oh, and also that IRS attorneys love to fuck lawyers whenever possible (the prof had been one).
Oh please. He said more aggressive, not review records more closely. And as for avoidance is good because you are intended to avoid b/c tax is driving social policy -- under that rubric, at this stage of the game (2004 is sooooooo last year), he'd be looking at things to do differently this year, not trying to recharacterize his vacation in Hawaii as a business expense and the tips he paid to the doorman and housekeeper as charitable contributions.

Fucking PollyBob.

ETA I think I might actually have used "rubric" correctly, after looking it up after the fact. I think the connotation is correct. Hmmmmm.

EATA Hm. whoopassman . . . whoopasshole . . . whoopasinine. Ill-considered name.
__________________
I'm using lipstick again.

Last edited by ltl/fb; 04-15-2005 at 12:35 AM..
ltl/fb is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:12 PM.