LawTalkers
Forums
User Name
Remember Me?
Password
Register
FAQ
Calendar
Go to Page...
» Site Navigation
»
Homepage
»
Forums
»
Forum
>
User CP
>
FAQ
»
Online Users: 1,130
0 members and 1,130 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
»
Search Forums
»
Advanced Search
Thread
:
Patting the wrists, rolling the eyes.
View Single Post
05-04-2005, 12:54 PM
#
3735
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
local rules change
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
It's passed in the House. That's all.
Here this passed...
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory...olitan/3166954
House to cheerleaders: hooray, but no hip-hips
Bill that bans dirty dancing, but doesn't define it, nears passage
By KRISTEN MACK and ALLAN TURNER
Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle
SPIRIT OF THE LAW
Highlights of the cheerleader legislation:
• What it does: Prohibits school dance teams, drill teams and cheerleaders from performing "in a manner that is overtly sexually suggestive" at public school events.
• What it doesn't do: Specifically define the prohibited behavior or set any penalty for violations.
• What supporters say: Pep routines have pushed the boundaries of decency and exploit performers.
• What foes say: The bill is a toothless and meaningless effort to legislate morality.
• What's next: If it survives one more House vote, the bill goes to the state Senate.
AUSTIN - House members got into the spirit of toning down suggestive cheerleading Tuesday, rallying behind a bill that could leave Texas cheerleaders shakin' a little less booty next year.
By a 65-56 vote, the House gave preliminary approval to a bill sponsored by Rep. Al Edwards, D-Houston, curbing "sexually suggestive" routines by cheerleaders, drill teams or other public school performance groups.
The bill doesn't define the behavior it is trying to prevent or specify punishment.
Edwards, who in past sessions has battled raunchy pop lyrics and advocated cutting off drug dealers' fingers, pledged that Tuesday's vote was just the opening volley in his effort to curb gyrating teenage booty-shakers.
"I've seen it with my own eyes," Edwards said. "I've had people talk to me about it at football games. There was just a feeling that people were waiting for something to be done about it."
RT- WTTW- next he's going after nips showing in depos- gotta wear a bra he says. Of course, that would be for state court cases only.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Hank Chinaski
Powered by
vBadvanced
CMPS v3.0.1
All times are GMT -4. The time now is
07:47 PM
.
-- LawTalk Forums vBulletin 3 Style
-- vBulletin 2 Default
-- Ravio_Blue
-- Ravio_Orange
Contact Us
-
Lawtalkers
-
Top
Powered by:
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By:
URLJet.com