Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
I have no problem with the theory of evolution. I just don't think it explains the existence of a universal morality code. Besides that it seems to explain everything else.
|
First, I question the existence of a univeral moral code. If there is one, I've never seen it. Cite, please.
As to how evolution could explain the development of morality generally, I think it has been touched on here. Human beings on their own face limited prospects of survival. Those who learned to cooperate would multiply more quickly and wipe out those who could not. Much of basic morality is necessary for humans to live together. If you steal my spear, I'm going to come kill you with my club. If I fuck your mate, you're going to want to kill me. If we kill each other, the tribe will lack 2 warriors to defend it the next time the Ug Ug tribe comes over to attack our yam pile. Likewise, the tribe that learns to help its injured and sick will increase and prosper faster than the every man for himself tribe on club island. As society became more advanced and complex, so did the rules that govern its behavior.
We are not the only species that depends on the altruism of others for its survival, we are just the only ones to assign fancy words and divine meaning to it. I don't know why you feel compelled to apply and Intelligent Design theory to the development of morals when there are many more plausible explanations available.
eta: What spooky said.
