LawTalkers
Forums
User Name
Remember Me?
Password
Register
FAQ
Calendar
Go to Page...
» Site Navigation
»
Homepage
»
Forums
»
Forum
>
User CP
>
FAQ
»
Online Users: 2,307
0 members and 2,307 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
»
Search Forums
»
Advanced Search
Thread
:
Patting the wrists, rolling the eyes.
View Single Post
05-25-2005, 04:22 PM
#
4500
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,145
Sorry, Flinty, nothing personal
Quote:
Originally posted by Shape Shifter
First, I question the existence of a univeral moral code. If there is one, I've never seen it. Cite, please.
As to how evolution could explain the development of morality generally, I think it has been touched on here. Human beings on their own face limited prospects of survival. Those who learned to cooperate would multiply more quickly and wipe out those who could not. Much of basic morality is necessary for humans to live together. If you steal my spear, I'm going to come kill you with my club. If I fuck your mate, you're going to want to kill me. If we kill each other, the tribe will lack 2 warriors to defend it the next time the Ug Ug tribe comes over to attack our yam pile. Likewise, the tribe that learns to help its injured and sick will increase and prosper faster than the every man for himself tribe on club island. As society became more advanced and complex, so did the rules that govern its behavior.
We are not the only species that depends on the altruism of others for its survival, we are just the only ones to assign fancy words and divine meaning to it. I don't know why you feel compelled to apply and Intelligent Design theory to the development of morals when there are many more plausible explanations available.
eta
: What spooky said.
If you believed any of this, or more accurately practiced any of this, you would spend more time working for your employer to justify your job than posting here every five fucking minutes. Or are you one of the "only out for myself" guys that natrual selection didn't quite completely eliminate.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Hank Chinaski
Powered by
vBadvanced
CMPS v3.0.1
All times are GMT -4. The time now is
05:53 PM
.
-- LawTalk Forums vBulletin 3 Style
-- vBulletin 2 Default
-- Ravio_Blue
-- Ravio_Orange
Contact Us
-
Lawtalkers
-
Top
Powered by:
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By:
URLJet.com