LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,553
0 members and 2,553 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 05-27-2005, 04:49 PM   #4721
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
Sorry, Flinty, Nothing Personal

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
OK - so you have to agree on the parts of the moral code that are relative to your discussion on morality. So in other words if you are talking about polygamy, you need to agree on the part of the code that discusses polygamy, but no others. That is valid.

I use the introductory clause because if both participants to the converation believe morality is all based on selfishness (which is commonly held belief among may Atheists and Agnostics), then you do have a basis for morality and you don't need a code. The discussion of polygamy and killing would then revolve around the issue over whether such rules if enforced would be in the interest of the participants of the conversation.
Has anyone on here argued that morality is all based on selfishness? I don't recall seeing that argument. So part of this whole thing could be that you really need to talk this out with someone who actually has the view you are ascribing to anyone who doesn't agree with you.
__________________
I'm using lipstick again.
ltl/fb is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 AM.