LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 847
1 members and 846 guests
Replaced_Texan
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-07-2005, 06:01 PM   #283
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Sour Grapes on CAFTA?

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Funny -- when you first posted about that, you claimed that Tauscher's vote was motivated by the "fact" that she was in the pocket of the unions -- a silly claim, given her generally pro-business stance. (Something I pointed out then, while also noting that her stance surprised and somewhat disappointed me.)

Now you are saying it was "sour grapes." That is certainly more likely than your first theory. OTOH, "alien mind-control" is more likely than the theory that Tauscher is the (always monolithic) unions' bitch.

Have you checked to see if Tauscher's office had a stated reason for opposing CAFTA?
No - I said one option was that the unions got to her. I haven't totally ruled that out. Another option I stated later was that she did not want to give Bush a win going into the congressional elections. T-Rex said that it was not just to blacken Bush's eye but if Tauscher was voting against it there must be a good reason. And if her reason was union pressure or sour grapes, like she is realy going to admit this on her web page. Either way, she is not going against the bill for the good of the nation.
Spanky is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 PM.