Quote:
Originally posted by Fair and Equitable
No sock just a long-time lurker and first-time poster, just check the created on date. But, as is your habit, you refuse to respond to the substance and instead shift the topic. Does that work for you in your legal career?
That said, generally you're a better debater than Sebby, who seems to have the standard liberal responses programmed in on his keybroad.
Sebby's Keyboard
F1: Bush Lies!
F2: Haliburton!
F3: No WMDs!
F4: Make love not war!
etc.
|
I recite them time and time again because nobody from the GOP has or can refite them. I'm a litigator. I grab a point and ram down your throat. You can't say Bush didn't lie. You can't say we had solid intel which pointed to the presence of WMDs. You call these "liberal responses," but they're actually facts. Unless you're an absolute shithead or engaging in willful ignorance, its as clear as the sun above that Bush lied.
But nobody wants Watergate II, and the Dems are gutless, so nobody presses for his head. He also learned from Nixon. I am certain the lies can never be tied all the way to Bush himself.
You didn't reaally believe Iraq qas a threat, did you? I mean, really, we all understood that he had to lie to get into Iraq to start reshaping the Middle East. Nobody really believes WMD were ever anything but a pretext, do they? So I guess, in the end, we were all complicit in the lie. We should have put the son of a bitch to his proofs on the Senate floor, but thee fucking Dems caved. Chickenshits.
