LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 151
0 members and 151 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-24-2005, 06:23 PM   #1281
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,084
The gravity of Clinton's lies.

Quote:
Originally posted by Iron Steve
Again, for the non-litigator, in a deposition, what is the "privacy" objection to a question or line of questions arguably designed to obtain relevant information?
I don't know what the law is on this, but I have instructed a witness not to answer a question in a deposition about where she lived because she was being stalked -- unrelated to the case -- and didn't want her address in the public record. When I explained this to the other attorney, he was initially difficult about it, but after a couple of minutes decided he could live without it.

The people deposing Clinton were not interesting in being reasonable. They were using the litigation as a means to harass a sitting President.

Quote:
back when this was fresh, 20/20, I believe (i think it was Cathryn Crier) did a story on people who were actually prosecuted for perjury in very similar (except for the president aspect) circumstances. I can't remember the facts but I recall the story profiled 2 or 3 people who actually served time for very similar perjurious events, eg: they lied about what could be characterized as irrelevant affairs in depos or on the stand.
Baseball players hit 70 home runs in a season all the time. Barry Bonds and Mark McGwire have done it in the last few years.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:20 AM.