Quote:
Originally posted by Iron Steve
It seems that you (and dems for years) have been using it as a tacit justification.
|
Only if you don't bother to listen to what I'm saying. I think it's a reason to vote against impeachment, but it doesn't justify perjury. Perjury should have consequences -- just not impeachment.
Quote:
|
If wasn't President (or another Executitve Branch official) the special prosecutor law would not have applied, so you are technically correct about Starr, but I am not sure that was your point.
|
Any prosecutor, special or otherwise.
Quote:
|
As for Plaintiff's lawyers taking the case, given the facts, I would say if he was a well known person or had deep pockets, someone could have been found. Maybe hank?
|
I think you're supporting my point about the merits. It's odd to hear this coming from the party of tort reform.
Quote:
|
Me too, but along my character compels to abide by the letter of the law. If only Clinton had been of like mind.
|
Indeed. See my post above re wasted potential.
Afternoon, all.