LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 4,380
0 members and 4,380 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-27-2005, 09:46 PM   #1523
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
Law suits and the President

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
I expect a lot from our intelligence servies, but I don't expect them to know every weapon that every country has. How could they know what is in every building in Iraq or what every item is that get transported into Iraq. I know that Saddam had used WMDs before, he was continually trying to get his hands on more, and he kept obstructing the inspectors. It seemed obvious to me.
It seems to me that every one of the foregoing sentences is objectively obvious, which leads me to one thing, among many, that I don't get about the liberals. Why can't they see the obvious?

Of course, if Bush had done nothing, and now, two years down the road, Saddam had anthrax and successfully scored a WMD anthrax attack on us, killing 1000, the liberals would be up in arms. oh the whiny voices and handwringing we would see.

"Bush did nothing, why didn't he stop Saddam, we knew he was dangerous, we knew he was obstructing the inspectors, we knew he had used WMDs before, we knew our faux-allies like France and Germany were feckless and complict, where was our intelligence??, were was our preemptive deterrent??, did we learn nothing from 911??, oh the humanity, Bush was chasing bin ladens ghost in Afghanistan when he should have been focused on the threat of others like Saddam etc etc etc et al etc"
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 AM.