Quote:
sebastian_dangerfield
Some stupid cunt* in last week's National Review actually wrote a fucking piece on why its ok for the GOP to be utterly inconsistent and totally self indulgent in its policies. His premise was that hypocrisy was good. He went as far as to say that being a fucking chickenhawk should not be subject to scrutiny.
That a magazine of that caliber has fallen to the depth where it'd publish hackery like that indicates how heavily the kool aid is flowing in some sectors of the GOP. The level of wilful ignorance and outright horseshit doublespeak in the party is just aamazing. Its gone past scary straight into funny.
|
Cite please.*
*That being said, the NR/NRO has in the last ten years really fractured along the Federalist/Conservative wing and the Catholic/Conservative (i.e. pragmatic social conservative wing). Buckley and O'Sullivan exemplified both, keeping the far former primary over the latter. I'd like to see the actual author rather than your filtered read on it.
Quote:
|
(I've run out of insults for these vermin).
|
Ran out? Ran out!!!!
Go to moveon.com, Answer.org, or petterthottam.com. They'll give you the Glenngary Leads. I hear they're
gold
