LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 156
0 members and 156 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-29-2005, 06:19 PM   #1742
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
More tyranny I like

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch


Regulatory taking, as I (mis?)understand the term, has nothing to do with building the interstate system. Again, maybe I am misusing my terms but that sort of eminent domain taking, which I believe is clearly allowed by the Constitution but requires compensation, is different.
Spanky misunderstands the distinction between the two types of takings. But both can be takings under the constitution. Physical takings (accomplished by eminent domain) always require just compensation. Regulatory takings aren't always takings, so don't necessarily require compensation.

BTW, I seem to recall reading an article years back suggesting that most times when compensation is paid, the payment is well above 100% of FMV, mainly to deter lawsuits. So statutes providing for more than just compensation really won't solve the problem.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:18 AM.