LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 163
0 members and 163 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-01-2005, 05:40 PM   #2016
robustpuppy
Moderator
 
robustpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
Note to all of you

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
1) I never said that there was no sexism today.

2) This post assumes that all this censoring of speech helps reduce racism and sexism. I think that is a ridiculous assumption.

3) The statement that she rose from a cowgirl to being on the supreme court is not sexist. And trying to label it as sexist diminishes the legitimacy of critisizing other comments that really are sexist. If you cry wolf too many times people stop taking you seriously.
Who's censoring? There's a huge difference between criticizing comments by powerful people and censorship. Uh, I think there might even be some principle relating to the former that informs that little thingy we have, what's it called again honey, help me out here, I'm just a cavegirl, your laws frighten and confuse me, uh ... the First Amendment?
robustpuppy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 AM.