LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,522
0 members and 1,522 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-04-2005, 01:28 PM   #2273
Say_hello_for_me
Theo rests his case
 
Say_hello_for_me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: who's askin?
Posts: 1,632
Nomination

Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
After a weekend of full time review and study of the background of the potential nominees, my preferences, in order from most preferential to least preferential (but better than nothing), as based on not necessarily equal consideration of their respective record/perceived ideology, accomplishments/personal history, and the political considerations of the confirmation process, are:


1. Janice Rodgers Brown
2. Edith Jones
3. Sam Alito
4. tie: either one of
(i) John Roberts;
(ii) Michael McConnell; or
(iii) Emilio Garza
7. Michael Luttig
8. Larry Thompson
9. tie: either
(i) Harvey Wilkinson; or
(ii) Ted Olson
11. tie: either one of
(i) Richard Epstein
(ii) Richard Posner or
(iii) Frank Easterbrook
14. tie: either
(i) Edith Clement; or
(ii) Alberto Gonzalez
16. Ken Starr
17 tie: either
(i) John Ashcroft
(ii) Robert Bork

In the case of two consecutive nominees getting shot down I would opt for the nuclear option, Orrin Hatch.

Anyone else care to go on record?
I like a lot of those names, but what about that guy who's wife died on one of the 9/11 planes? Could you imagine the fix the Dems would be in? Where is he likely to stand on abortion?

Credit me later, but if he's in my corner on abortion, Gitmo, property rights and state's rights (generally speaking, NTTAWWT), this would be a feat of Rovian proportions.
__________________
Man, back in the day, you used to love getting flushed, you'd be all like 'Flush me J! Flush me!' And I'd be like 'Nawww'

Say_hello_for_me is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 AM.