Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
Nice misdirection, but the liberals feted Arafat and frankly they should answer for it. You asked about sympathy for these people, well, this was the guy pulling the strings and you gave him a nobel peace prize. Sharon would have taken him out but the liberals wouldnt tolerate it. They sympathised with his cause. Clinton wanted to give the keys to the destruction of Israel-now that would have been some blood on his hands.
He was their hero. And the leader of the homicide bombers.
|
This is what I call the "Hey, look over there!" mode of argument. Are we still talking about how the use of the term "suicide bomber" was intended to evoke sympathy for terrorists?
I thought not. If you can't answer a simple question (do you believe they did, or do you believe they didn't?), you certainly can't stay on the topic.
Your suggestion that Arafat was my hero (since I'm a liberal) is up there with your suggestion that Byrd is my consience (since I'm a Democrat) -- proof that you are incapable of defending what you say, or what your party does, without resorting to the baseless, vicious, and moronic. Cheers!
