Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
You can form a belief, without being close-minded or unwilling to change that belief when confronted with new evidence.
That you claim not to have formed a belief, despite god knows how many hours spent jerking off over right-wing websites and fantasizing that their stories might be true, is evidence only of your intellectual dishonesty.
And, as I said before, your complete lack of balls. You rant and rave about the Clintons' "crimes, but when challenged to say what you believe, you cop out.
You know that if you say you don't believe it, then the balloon of your ranting is popped.
And you know that if you say you do, you appear crazy, and you force everyone to admit that the whole "the Clintons are murderers!" crap is not just a schtick for you. (As I know it is not).
|
You are truly obsessed. You need the DSM IV or anti-psychotics. I have said, repeatedly, that they are criminals. I firmly believe that they place their own interests above those of their respective offices or the constitution. What the details and the breadth of all of their crimes are or how far they would go in the pursuit of power, I don't know. I look forward to the facts coming out. I suppose I should go read liberal reporter Ed Klein's new book and get some more details. What is unclear about that?
I think your constant use of ad hominen attacks is evidence that you realize there is no there there. At least not the there you want to be there.
Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
And this is relevant to the use of the term "suicide bomber", rather than the meaningless term "homicide bomber", how?
|
It is part of a concerted campaign to give aid and comfort to the enemy. It starts with giving a baby killer a Nobel Peace Prize and leads to attaching PC terms to simple acts of killers and terrorists.
Rachael Corrie is probably looking up from hell, proud that her mindless defence and softening of killers is perpetuated.
