LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 145
0 members and 145 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-06-2005, 09:14 PM   #2737
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
the kiss of death

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
That's an entirely different issue.

The right does not lose me when it calls for parental consent -- I can understand that view, I just disagree with it.

What I can't understand is parental notification -- except to the extent that it's a surrogate for consent, it seems to me to be promoting a level of government interference with the family that conservatives especially should not be advocating.
That is a fair distinction that I don't wholly disagree with. My view would probably never get to consent, because I stop with notification, although, while I see the point about notification being a surrogate for consent and if you have the right why require the notification, I think it is a big enough issue and a serious enough medical procedure that putting in place a system where the parents have to be notified (and non-prejudicially delaying the procedure by that process) might not be bad thing. The family should be involved in the process at least to advise (but, if its a right, not prevent) on the procedure.

[gotta take a call, bye bye]
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 AM.